Legal Opinion
City of Dallas v. Vanesko
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided February 9, 2004No. 05-03-00022-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MARTIN RICHTER.
This is a zoning case. The Vaneskos sought a variance from a local zoning ordinance, but the Board of Adjustment refused to grant a variance. The Vaneskos filed an application for writ of certiorari in the trial court in order to seek review of the Board of Adjustment decision. The cause was tried to the court below without a jury. The only evidence considered was the record of the Board of Adjustment proceedings submitted upon the return and supplemental return of the writ of certiorari. The trial court reversed the Board of Adjustment on the basis…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Dallas Merchant's & Concessionaire's Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- San Antonio Area Foundation v. LangTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- City of San Angelo v. Boehme BakeryTexas Supreme Court · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Dallas v. VaneskoTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Dallas v. VaneskoTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Ivan Harris v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Fort Worth and the City of Fort Worth, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
- Ivan Harris v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Fort Worth and the City of Fort Worth, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005