Legal Opinion

Constant v. American Baptist Home Mission Society

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided May 15, 1886Published

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The three bonds and mortgages upon which the actions were brought were duly executed and acknowledged by Elizabeth Meehen and Hugh Meehen, her husband, to secure the payment of the sums named therein. These sums they received as loans from Mr. Samuel S. Constant through Mr. Deane, who acted as Mr. Constant’s attorney and counsel in the transaction. The date of the first bond and mortgage is October 2, 1882, and the other two are dated February 17, 1883. The papers were duly delivered to Mr. Deane, who handed the bonds over to Mr. Constant, and retained the mortgages for record. This, in law,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ingalls and Stockman v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. De Lancey v. . StearnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Kendall v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API