Legal Opinion

Matter of Baum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The statements of subscribing witnesses to petitions substantially complied with the provisions of section 135 of the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17), as amended by chapter 955 of the Laws of 1935. This case differs from Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen (268 N. Y. 620), decided herewith, in that there was no substantial compliance with the statute in the Dorsey case.

The order of the Appellate Division which approved the action of the Election Board in refusing to file such petitions should be reversed and the Election Board directed to file such petitions.

The orders of the Appellate Division in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Dorsey v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Foote v. LeeNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Potash v. MolikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Rosenbaum v. PowerNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re MarionNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API