Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Mayor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1900Published

Appeal by Theodore Sattler and another from an order of the . Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office- of the clerk of the county of New York on the 2d day of October, 1900, denying their motion to refer their claim to the commissioners of estimate and assessment under chapter 1006 of the Laws of 1895.

1Concurrence

Hatch, J. (concurring):

I concur in the views expressed by Mr. Justice Ingraham in his opinion herein, and I am also of the opinion that his. construction of the acts in question has received the sanction both of this court and of the Coart of Appeals. (Matter of Mayor, 28 App. Div. 143; affd., 157 N. Y. 409.)

The record in that case, which was before this court on the appeal, discloses that the map then in question related to Gerard avenue, between One Hundred and Sixty-eighth street and One Hundred and Sixty-ninth street, as laid down on section 9 of the final plans of the twenty-third and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. In Re Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. In the Matter of the Petition of BarclayNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API