Legal Opinion
City of Manassas Park v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 16, 1980No. 506-78PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
By the amended petitions the principal or lead claimant is the Upper Occoquan Sewage Authority (UOSA), a body corporate and politic of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Four creatures of that Commonwealth, Manassas, Manas-sas Park, Fairfax County, and Prince William County (municipalities), entered into a service agreement with UOSA to provide for an advanced waste water treatment system for the upper Occoquan, which flows into the Potomac. Manassas Park originally filed this action, and the other municipalities would now join as third parties. UOSA now claims to be suing for their benefit. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- D. R. Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Texas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ontario Power Generation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Galloway Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- City of Alexandria v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.