Legal Opinion

Yowell v. Fort Smith Pure Milk Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District; Daniel Hon, Judge;

1Opinion of the Court

Wood; J.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the circuit court sustaining a motion for a new trial on behalf of appellee who was the defendant below. Appellant attempts to appeal from an order of the trial court granting appellee a new trial.

Section 1188' of Kirby’s Digest provides, in part: # * * “But no appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting a new trial, in a case made or, bill of exceptions, shall be effectual for any .purpose unless the notice of appeal contains an .assent on the part of the appellant that, if the order be affirmed judgment absolute shall be rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matyski v. BuczkowskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Cormack v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API