Legal Opinion
Hardeman v. State.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 23, 1918No. A-2933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge. Fred Hardeman was convicted of burglary in the first degree, his motion for a new trial was overruled, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated defendant, was informed against for the offense of burglary, convicted, and sentenced, in accord with the verdict of the jury, to be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a period of seven years. Motion for a new trial having been overruled, defendant prosecutes an appeal to this court.
The charging part of the information is as follows:
“That 'Fred Hardeman did, in Grady county, and in the state of Oklahoma, on or about the 9th day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and sixteen, and anterior to the presentment hereof, commit…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Bowlegs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Carruthers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.