Legal Opinion

Elizondo v. Read

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1990No. 50A04-8902-CV-50PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Urbano and Irma Elizondo appeal the summary judgment entered against them in their suit against Thomas I. and Jacqueline K. Read and the Auditor of Marshall County challenging the procedures of a tax sale by which the Reads purchased the Elizondo’s property. The Elizondos argue the statutory provisions that required the Auditor to send notice, by certified mail, to the Elizondo’s “last known address” are constitutionally insufficient under the present circumstances. We agree and therefore reverse.

ISSUE

The Elizondos raise several issues. But, because one is dispositive, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Holland v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elizondo v. ReadIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Centrium Group v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1992
  3. Smith v. BreedingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Elizondo v. ReadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Yoder v. Elkhart County AuditorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API