Otten v. Schutt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
The action is for recovery of damages, both compensatory and punitive, occasioned by the slanderous statements of Lester Schutt.
The issues are whether under the evidence and facts in the instant action the statements made by Lester Schutt to the chief of police constitute a conditionally privileged communication and whether such statements were maliciously made.
A privileged communication or statement, in the law of libel and slander, is one which, except for the occasion on which or the circumstances under which it is made, would be defamatory and actionable. 33 Am. Jur., Libel and Slander,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hancock v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Flynn v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Joseph v. BaarsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Hathaway v. BrugginkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Bigner v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fridovich v. FridovichSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Calero v. Del Chemical Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bromund v. HoltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Curtis J. Robison v. Charles Lescrenier and Gammex, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- David M. Schlessinger v. George SalimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.