Legal Opinion

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 13, 1982No. Nos. 81-1052, 81-1272, 81-1273 and 81-1554PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.

WILKEY, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners challenge a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision prescribing an interim cost allocation methodology for use in setting rates for interstate services provided by American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T). They charge that the FCC failed to explain its reversal of a previous cost allocation decision and violated the “arbitrary and capricious” provision of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).1 We reject these contentions and affirm the agency’s action.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Problem of Cost…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Hughes Television Network, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Latecoere International, Inc. v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Rural Cellular Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Telocator Network of America v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API