Legal Opinion
Mahony v. Danis
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 23, 1983Published
1Opinion of the Court
95 N.J. 50 (1983)
469 A.2d 31
LEO H. MAHONY, EDWARD SAMUELSEN AND 3530 REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENTS,
v.
STEPHEN DANIS AND CLAIRE DANIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
December 23, 1983.
Richard J. Schachter, Schachter, Wohl, Cohn & Trombadore and Melvin S. Narol, Jamieson, McCardell, Moore, Peskin & Spicer, for plaintiffs-respondents.
Joyce M. Usiskin, for defendants-appellants.
ORDER
This matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted;
It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Handler; Dissent; Concurrence · Handler.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Idaho Department of Employment v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Baker v. Normanoch Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Central Railroad v. MacCartneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. PlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- A. J. & J. O. Pilar, Inc. v. Lister Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.