Frair v. Sirloin Stockade, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
Although several questions were initially presented for review, the only issue presented by the petition for certiorari is whether the trial court erred because it failed to make specific findings concerning the left leg, shoulder, and back of the claimant which were alleged in his Form 3.
Before the adoption of Workers’ Compensation Court Rule 19, par. 5, 1 it was held that if there were multiple injuries to different parts of the body which arose from the same accident, an award of compensation for one or more of the injuries without a finding either denying or awarding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flint Construction Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Oklahoma City Tent and Awning Company v. MalsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Oil Capitol Sheet Metal Works v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Yuba Heat Transfer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. HaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Dunkin v. Instaff PersonnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Stice v. DouglasCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Brown v. Oxy USA, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Himes v. Country Style Health Care, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.