Legal Opinion

Douglas Attridge, Margaret Attridge, Husband and Wife, Ludwig Heinz, Margie Armstrong v. Johns Manville v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. United States of America, Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 30, 1991No. 89-35823Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

942 F.2d 790

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Douglas ATTRIDGE, Margaret Attridge, husband and wife,

Ludwig Heinz, Margie Armstrong, Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHNS MANVILLE, et al, Defendant,

v.

EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant/Third-Party

Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee.

Nos. 89-35823, 89-35824 and 89-35826.

United States Court of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. LaBarge v. County of MariposaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Palmroy P.K. Bush v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. United States of America, Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Chambers (Bernice W.) v. Diamant (Lawrence A.), Trustee for Marathon Home LoansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Donald M. Posegate, and Ida J. Posegate, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API