Sommer v. Pierre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, *465New York County (Deborah A. Kaplan, J.), entered January 17, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion to bifurcate the trial on issues of liability and damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Bifurcation is appropriate in complicated cases of liability and damages where such clarification or simplification will assist in reaching a fair and more expeditious resolution of the issues (22 NYCRR 202.42 [a]; Mazur v Mazur, 288 AD2d 945 [2001]). A ruling on such a request is a matter of discretion as to which the trial court should be afforded…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mazur v. MazurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Johnson v. Hudson River Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carpenter v. County of EssexAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Keane v. PiersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Castro v. Malia Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019