Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Ruhl

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for money had and received to plaintiff’s use.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

On August 13, 1898, the plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract for the exchange of certain properties, the defendants agreeing to convey to plaintiff certain premises of theirs in Hew York city, subject to mortgages aggregating $29,400, and the plaintiff agreeing to transfer to defendants certain premises of the plaintiff’s at Freeport, Queens county, subject to a mortgage of $2,200. There was a difference of equities amounting to $1,000 in favor of the plaintiff, which the defendants adjusted by giving the plaintiff two notes, one for $500, payable six months after date, the other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Minor v. OzierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. In re CooperNew York Surrogate's Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. StecklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Ruhl v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API