Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1933No. 30445PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-owen, J.

A judgment was recovered against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, the appellant, in a suit based on a declaration filed by the Delta & Pine Land Company upon a fidelity bond covering officers and employees of the Delta & Pine Land Company for various sums set opposite the names of these officers and employees in a schedule attached to the bond and known as a fidelity schedule bond. The appellant was at the date of the contract, and since, authorized to do business in this state, and subject to process therein.

The appellee, Delta & Pine Land Company, sought to recover two thousand seven…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Phoenix Cotton Oil Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. New York Life Ins v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Guthrie v. Indemnity Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. City of Bristol v. BostwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  2. Livingston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC v. Durham Auctions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Ryan v. GlennDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
  5. English v. Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API