Legal Opinion

Bobby L. Forrest and Gerald E. Kiefer, D/B/A Forrest & Kiefer v. The Capital Buildings & Loan Assn.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1974No. 74-1066PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Two lawyers challenge, as antitrust violations under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, the practice followed by each defendant savings and loan association in requiring its borrowers to pay the legal fees of attorneys selected by the savings and loan association to examine titles for it, render title opinions to it, and prepare the necessary security agreements, when lending its money.

Under plaintiffs’ theory such requirement constitutes a tying arrangement by which the attorneys’ services are tied to the extension of credit in restraint of free competition and the practice deprives the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forrest v. Capital Building & Loan AssociationDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1973

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Anderson Foreign Motors, Inc. v. New England Toyota Distributor, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
  5. Foster v. Maryland State Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API