Knotts v. Zurich Insurance Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentWintersheimer, Justice
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because an insurance company must continue to abide by the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, KRS 304.12-230 even after a lawsuit has been filed against its insured.
We recognize that the majority opinion does reverse the Court of Appeals. However, the majority does not go far enough in reversing and as such the result is of very limited value, if any, to these appellants or any others who may share the same general problem. Any conduct engaged in by the insurer may form the basis of a bad faith claim.
This is a case of first impression…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. GlassKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReederKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- Curry v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.