Legal Opinion
Rodabaugh v. Denney
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The motion is by the defendants, sued as trustees of the Erie Railroad Company, to stay further prosecution of the action. The action, as appears from the complaint, is for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff while working in interstate commerce in the employ of the Erie Railroad Company and is brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. It is alleged that employees of the railroad company built a scaffold in connection with repairing a bridge; that on October 18, 1937, while the plaintiff in performance of his work was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foust v. Munson Steamship LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bela M. Haberern v. The Lehigh and New England Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Baker v. Southeastern Michigan Shippers Co-Operative Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
- Levin v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Erie RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
- Munnelly v. FarrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.