Legal Opinion

United States v. Laurence Keiswetter

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1989No. 87-2347PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EN BANC

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, McKAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges. JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This case is before the court sitting en banc to rehear the question of the appropriate remedy to apply following the panel’s determination that the record did not support defendant Keiswetter’s plea of guilty and remand was necessary to clarify the factual basis of the plea. United States v. Keiswetter, 860 F.2d 992 (10th Cir.1988). Mr. Keiswetter now contends on rehearing that the panel should not have ordered the partial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. Laurence KeiswetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Edward Lee ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Gert Albertus TheronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald L. TunningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Albert John Blair, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Dwight Steven BarryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Alderman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. State v. StillingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API