Legal Opinion

Baker v. Bagg

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in partition.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

It appears that one Thomas A. Bagg died on October 10, 1905, intestate and seized of certain real estate. There survived him various heirs at law and, among others, his son, Thomas J. Bagg, who is the husband of the defendant Ida Tibbitts Bagg. On February 201, 1903, Thomas J. Bagg, being then married, for a valuable con*187sidcration, by an instrument in writing, sold, assigned, transferred and conveyed to the plaintiff, Sina Baker, all the interest in and to the real and personal estate of his father, Thomas A. Bagg, which he then had or might have after the death of his said father and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunham v. OsbornNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Sparrow v. . KingmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  3. Owen v. RobbinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of CornellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API