Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Ramos

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided October 25, 1999No. Civil 99-1138(JP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PIE RAS, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

The Court has before it Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law Contesting That a Violation of a DNR Rule Provides a Ranger Probable Cause to Arrest (docket No. 20), Defendant Victor Ramos’ Opposition (docket No. 21), and Plaintiffs’ Reply (docket No. 25).

Plaintiffs Roy Armstrong (“Armstrong”), Linda Riggs (“Riggs”), and the conjugal partnership constituted between them (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint on February 5, 1999, alleging claims under the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peaje Invs. LLC v. Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R. (In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Peaje Invs. LLC v. Puerto Rico Highways (In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico)United States District Court · 2017
  3. United States v. Two Mitsubishi Pick-Up TrucksDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
  4. Peaje Investments LLC v. PR Highways and TransportationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API