General Investment, Inc. v. Thomas
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Judge.
Exercising “our broad authority under La.Const. art. 5 § 2 to issue all need*96ful writs (see also La.C.C.P. art. 2164); and considering further the requirement of La.Const. art. 1 § 22 that courts be open to provide adequate remedy; and considering further the Due Process Clause of U.S. Const. Amend. 14,” we granted certiorari “so that this court, in order to preserve its jurisdiction from loss by mootness by sale on April 9, may consider the merits of applicant’s demand for permanent injunction, despite the fact that the trial court has not ruled on this demand, since applicant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Le Blanc v. Democratic State Central CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Coleman v. MarzulloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Baker v. Democratic State Central CommitteeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Inv., Inc. v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- General Inv., Inc. v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982