Legal Opinion
(PC) Bland v. Rodriguez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00478Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSHUA BLAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 11 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS v. IN PART 12 ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., (ECF No. 57) 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On June 25, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for discovery sanctions. (ECF No. 57). 19 Defendants “move for dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hyde & Drath v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MarchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Briscoe v. President of the Bank of the CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.