Legal Opinion

In Re Sugar Industry Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 16, 1975No. 201APublishedCited by 3 opinions

D. South Carolina, Civil Action No. 75-1147

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH * , Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN ■ A. ROBSON * , WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. ' ' PER CURIAM.

The Panel previously transferred several actions in this litigation to the Northern District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned them to the Honorable George H. Boldt, sitting by designation, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. In re Sugar Industry Antitrust Litigation, 395 F.Supp. 1271 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1975).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Sugar Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
  2. In Re Sugar Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. In Re Sugar Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  3. In re Sugar Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API