Legal Opinion

Merck KGaA v. Hopewell Pharma Ventures, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 24, 2025No. 1:22-cv-01365Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MERCK KGaA, MERCK SERONO SA, and ARES TRADING SA, Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 22-1365-GBW-CJB v. HOPEWELL PHARMA VENTURES, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiffs Merck KGaA, Merck Serono SA, and Ares Trading SA (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Merck”) filed suit against Defendants Hopewell Pharma Ventures, Inc. (“Hopewell’’), Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc., Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Apotex Inc., and Apotex Corp. (collectively, “Defendants”).! On December 23, 2024, the Court granted Hopewell’s Emergency Motion to Stay the Case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. In Re MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API