Legal Opinion

Barron v. Eason

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1946No. 35981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

Appellants, by their bill in this cause attack the legality of a tax sale to the state of a section of land located in Marion County and the validity of the title claimed by appellees under a state patent thereto. Appellants were grantees of the owner of the land at the time of the sale. Appellees say the tax sale was valid and they have a legal title under the state patent, but, if not, that they have a good title by adverse possession under Chapter 196, Laws of 1934, ¡Sec. 717, Code 1942. The chancellor decided in favor of appellees.

The first attack upon the legality of the tax sale is that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bowers v. AndrewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Brigins v. ChandlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Cox v. RichersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bower v. Chess & Wymand Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Chickasaw County v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carmadelle v. CustinMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brinston v. WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. De Moe v. McLeodMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. HayesMississippi Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API