Legal Opinion

Coolidge v. Coolidge

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 7, 1971No. 103-70PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

This is an action for partition of jointly owned property. The matter has proceeded to the point of a judgment ordering partition, but the division proceedings provided for in 12 V.S.A. § 5169 have not yet been ordered. The defendant, who opposes partition, appealed this judgment in regular form and has been confronted by a claim that this order is not final, but interlocutory, and can come up only by the certification procedures of V.R.A.P. 5. But Blanchard v. Cross, 97 Vt. 370, 372, 123 A. 382 (1924), defines the judgment to partition as being final with respect to the right to the remedy.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy, Admr. v. Rutter, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. Brattleboro Retreat v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. Blanchard v. CrossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  4. Gourley v. WoodburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
  5. Town of Fairlee v. BOSTON & MAINE CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nugent v. ShamborSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Don Lloyd Builders, Inc. v. PaltrowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Evelyn Tarnawa v. Richard GoodeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. Nugent v. ShamborSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Nugent v. ShamborSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API