Legal Opinion

Rosario Lindsey, Individually and as of the Estate of Charles Lindsey v. Caterpillar, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 26, 2007No. 05-4406PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Rosario Lindsey, individually and as executrix of the estate of Charles Lindsey, appeals from an order of the District Court granting summary judgment on her claim against Caterpillar arising out of the rollover of a sideboom pipe layer, manufactured by Caterpillar, which resulted in her husband’s death. Lindsey alleged that the pipe layer was defective in that it did not have a rollover protective structure. The District Court held that regulations promulgated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“the Act” or “the OSH Act”) created a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Solis v. Summit Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Ramsey Winch Inc. v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. American Tort Reform Ass'n v. Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. ConocoPhillips Co. v. HenryDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API