Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Donovan v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided October 8, 1998No. 95-519Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHold Away, Judge

I dissent from the majority’s holding that the Secretary’s decision not to approve the veteran’s proposed deed in lieu of foreclosure is a matter that can be reviewed by appellate authority. Review of the relevant statutes and regulations establish that the decision is committed to agency discretion.

The Secretary is authorized to provide home loan guarantees to eligible veterans. See 38 U.S.C. §§ 3702, 3703. In the event of a default on a VA guaranteed loan, the mortgagee is required to notify VA of the default. See 38 U.S.C. § 3732(a)(1); 38 C.F.R. § 36.4316(a) (1997). The mortgagee must…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Darrow v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  4. Malone v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  5. Willis v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API