Legal Opinion
Kinchen v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 29, 1983No. 81-2133PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
432 So.2d 586 (1983)
Randy Eugene KINCHEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 81-2133.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 11, 1983.
On Rehearing June 29, 1983.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard Greene, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James P. McLane, Certified Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
2Per curiam 1
Upon review of the record we conclude that the appellant is entitled to a new trial because a comment was made during closing arguments which was fairly…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Carlos Garza De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Trafficante v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- David v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Gains v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Sublette v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KinchenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Thornton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Demick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984