Legal Opinion

United States v. Corbitt

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1973No. Crim. 71-320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

The defendants were convicted of bank robbery. Their post-trial motions raise questions of double jeopardy, jury selection, jury contamination, and the propriety of their being identified. 1

On February 23, 1971, the Exton Branch of the Southeast National Bank was robbed by at least six men. Just as the robbery began, two surveillance cameras were activated and, as a result, literally hundreds of pictures were taken of the men who were inside the bank. These pictures, which were introduced into the evidence, showed the various robbers in many different…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Sonville Austin SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. McDanielsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
  3. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API