Legal Opinion
Goodspeed Airport, LLC v. East Haddam Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 13, 2009No. 3:06CV930(MRK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
In its Amended Complaint [doc. # 30-1], Goodspeed Airport, LLC (“Goodspeed”), a privately-owned and operated airport that has inland wetlands on the airport property, seeks to remove or cut trees from its property that are within seventy-five feet of the wetlands. Goodspeed wishes to cut down the trees because it believes they are obstructions to navigable airspace as defined by federal regulations promulgated under the Federal Aviation Act. See 14 C.F.R. § 77.1 et seq. Goodspeed contends that because of the wetlands’ location on its property,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nevada Department of Human Resources v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goodspeed Airport LLC v. East Haddam Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Goodspeed Airport, LLC v. East Haddam Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- HealthNow New York, Inc. v. New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Bowman v. HollandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Goodspeed Airport v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.