Legal Opinion

Federal Election Commission v. National Republican Senatorial Committee

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 24, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 93-1612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissal on the grounds that this action is barred by the five year statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

*17I. Background

The activities at issue in this ease date back to the 1985-1986 congressional campaign season. The Federal Election Commission (hereafter “FEC” or “Commission”) alleges that defendant National Republican Senatorial Committee (“NRSC”) violated the Federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campaign Legal Center v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  2. Fec v. NrscDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API