Legal Opinion

Erik v. BY AND THROUGH CATHERINE v. v. CAUSBY

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 28, 1997No. 5:97-cv-00587Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BOYLE, District Judge.

This motion is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, students in the Johnston County Schools and their parents, brought suit challenging the Johnston County Board of Education’s implementation and application of Board Policy 842, the Johnston County Student Accountability Policy (hereinafter, “Policy 842”). Policy 842 provides that students in grades three through eight who do not attain a designated score on a state-developed standardized test will be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API