Douglas Skokos v. Bruce Rhoades
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Douglas Skokos and Tim Chapman appeal the district court’s 1 dismissal of their action, which was brought under 42 U.S.C § 1983. Mr. Skokos also appeals the denial of his request for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
Mr. Skokos and Mr. Chapman each owned a business in Fort Smith, Arkansas, in which he had on the premises a so-called countertop machine, a device upon which customers could play up to seventy different electronic games. While most of those games were not games of chance, the machines did offer poker and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Skokos v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006