Parents Union for Public Schools v. Board of Education of School District
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentManderino, Justice
I must dissent. The gravamen of appellants’ complaint is that appellees went beyond the bounds of permissible bargaining by entering into a collective bargaining agreement containing provisions violative of state statutes. This Court *199has unambiguously stated that it is within the PLRB’s jurisdiction to determine what is bargainable under Act 195. PLRB v. State College Area School District, 461 Pa. 494, 337 A.2d 262 (1975). The majority fails to even cite this case. Clearly, there is no basis for dispensing with the PLRB’s expertise merely because a third party is bringing the suit as to what…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.