Ex Parte Huddleston
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON RELATOR’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.
DAVIDSON, Judge.
In his motion for rehearing, relator presents two propositions not presented originally. He insists that the judgment of conviction is void because (a) it does not affirmatively reflect that he was represented by counsel, either of his own selection or by appointment of the court, when he waived the right of trial by jury, as required by Art. 10a, C. C. P., and (b) it does not affirmatively appear therefrom that counsel was appointed to represent him as to a suspension of sentence, as provided by-Art. 776a, C. C. P.
The provision of Art. 10a,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- McMurray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932