Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Huddleston

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1946No. 23378Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON RELATOR’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, relator presents two propositions not presented originally. He insists that the judgment of conviction is void because (a) it does not affirmatively reflect that he was represented by counsel, either of his own selection or by appointment of the court, when he waived the right of trial by jury, as required by Art. 10a, C. C. P., and (b) it does not affirmatively appear therefrom that counsel was appointed to represent him as to a suspension of sentence, as provided by-Art. 776a, C. C. P.

The provision of Art. 10a,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. McMurray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API