Legal Opinion

T3 Enters., Inc. v. Safeguard Bus. Sys., Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2019No. Docket No. 45093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

*523This action arises out of Ada County and involves a distributorship agreement (the Distributor Agreement) between Appellant Safeguard Business Systems (SBS) and Respondent T3 Enterprises (T3). In 2006, T3 entered into the Distributor Agreement with SBS. In 2014, T3 filed suit alleging SBS had breached the Distributor Agreement by failing to prevent other SBS distributors from selling to T3's customers and for paying commissions to the interfering distributors rather than to T3. The Distributor Agreement between SBS and T3 contained an arbitration clause indicating…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WeigleIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Snap! Mobile v. Vertical RaiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Stiffler v. Hydroblend, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Swanson v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Gargoyle Granite & Marble, Inc. v. Opustone, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API