Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 14, 1981No. Civ. A. No. C75-560Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1338MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KRUPANSKY, District Judge.

This matter is presently before the Court on a series of motions advanced both orally and in writing by the defendant The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) pursuant to Rule 50(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., whereby CEI seeks a determination that dismissal of the plaintiff’s cause, in whole or in material part, is warranted on the grounds of insufficient proof. The City has responded in opposition. The Court, in the course of proceedings conducted on September 11, 1981, permitted oral argument relating to issues raised in the briefs during…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Northeastern Telephone Company v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Morelock v. NCR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API