Cobb v. Laird
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING ALL RELIEF AND DISMISSING THE ACTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that Army Regulation 635-20 is contrary to and in conflict with the United States Constitution, an Act of Congress, and a Department of Defense directive. The regulation in question prohibits filing a conscientious objector application at overseas replacement stations. Many of the same contentions were discussed and resolved unfavorably to plaintiff’s position in an opinion filed by this Court in Pifer v. Laird, 328 F.Supp. 649…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Schatten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. VincelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.