Legal Opinion
Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condo. Ass'n
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 24, 2018No. A147297PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanke, J.
*498*926After members of a condominium homeowner's association (HOA) voted by a very substantial majority to eliminate the practice of cumulative voting, plaintiff Kazuko K. Artus, who owns three units in the Gramercy Towers condominium development, sued the HOA. Artus claimed, among other things, that aspects of the election violated provisions of the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Davis-Stirling Act; Civ. Code, § 4000 et seq. ).1 She obtained preliminary injunctive relief on the basis of two of her statutory claims, staving off a board election under the new, direct vote rule.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- TransparentGov Novato v. City of Novato, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Arroyo v. Pacific Ridge Neighborhood Homeowners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Chen v. Valstock Ventures, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Chen v. Valstock Ventures, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.