Legal Opinion

Appleton Waterworks Co. v. City of Appleton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Winnebago-county: Geo. W. BueNElu, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWiNsnow, J.

Tbe plaintiff is a taxpayer in tbe defendant' city, and brought tbis action in equity in February, 1902, to-perpetually restrain tbe city from issuing or negotiating municipal bonds to tbe amount of $260,000, wbicb were about *366"to be issued under an ordinance then recently passed by the common council of the city, for the purpose of constructing ■waterworks in said city. The grounds upon which the injunction is sought are that the provisions of sec. 943, Stats. 1898, and ch. 348, Laws of 1899, (as amended by ch. 143, Laws of 1901), have not been complied with. A preliminary injunctional order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Burnham v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ellinwood v. City of ReedsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dane County v. ReindahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGarvey v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Connor v. City of MarshfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Flottum v. City of CumberlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Eau Claire v. Eau Claire Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Smith v. City of BurlingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API