People v. Watts
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOMES, J. —
Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant David Wayne Watts, Jr., pied no contest to being a felon in possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1)). He also admitted allegations that on April 21, 2000, he suffered a conviction of violating section 12031, subdivision (a)(2)(C) (section 12031(a)(2)(C)) and that he served a prior prison term for that conviction within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). The agreement included a five-year lid on Watts’s prison term. Watts reserved the right to argue at sentencing, and indeed argued at sentencing, that his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Ortiz-Magana v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People v. BuenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ortiz-Magana v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.