Legal Opinion

People v. Watts

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 2005No. F045778PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J. —

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant David Wayne Watts, Jr., pied no contest to being a felon in possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1)). He also admitted allegations that on April 21, 2000, he suffered a conviction of violating section 12031, subdivision (a)(2)(C) (section 12031(a)(2)(C)) and that he served a prior prison term for that conviction within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). The agreement included a five-year lid on Watts’s prison term. Watts reserved the right to argue at sentencing, and indeed argued at sentencing, that his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ortiz-Magana v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. People v. BuenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Ortiz-Magana v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API