Legal Opinion
Calhoun v. Jennings
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1987No. 29S02-8607-CV-652PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
This direct appeal challenges the constitutionality of the statutory notice provisions in tax sale proceedings. The trial court entered summary judgment against the plaintiff, finding that the statutory notice provisions violated the requirements of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. We disagree and reverse.
On September 5, 1975, Park Thirty-One Corporation (Park Thirty-One) granted a mortgage upon 8.508 acres of unimproved Hamilton County land to First National Bank of Kokomo (First National). First National recorded the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Josephine Weigner v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Porter v. Bankers Trust Co. of CaliforniaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Avco Financial Services of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Metro Holding Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Smith v. BreedingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gossett v. Auburn National Bank of AuburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.