In re Smith
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S ATTEMPT TO RETAIN AND PAY A MEDIATOR WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THIS COURT’S APPROVAL UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), FEDERAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2014(a), AND THE LOCAL RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
[Docket No. 332]
Jeff Bohm, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. Introduction
Is a mediator a “professional” under § 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code1 whose employment must first be approved before the mediation can be held? This Court has found no case law directly on point. The Court therefore issues this Memorandum Opinion explaining…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In the Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc., Debtor. Darryl Fanelli v. Nelson T. Hensley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Mark St. Angelo, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 17 v. Victoria Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re McDonald Bros. Construction, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.