Legal Opinion

Pappalardo Construction Co. v. Buck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1994No. 93-0356PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

This case arises out of a mechanics’ hen dispute. At issue is whether Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), as surety, can be held hable to pay more than the face amount of its hen-transfer bond as a result of posting a supersedeas bond for the initial appeal in this case.

The facts surrounding this case are fully set out in Pappalardo Constr. Co. v. Buck, 568 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), reversed in part, Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Buck, 594 So.2d 280 (Fla.1992). Gordon Buck (lienor) entered into an oral contract with Pappalardo Construction Co. (contractor) to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BuckSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Kulhanjian v. MoomjianSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Oakhurst Homes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Ritter v. R. C. BentleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Pappalardo Construction Co. v. BuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pappalardo v. BuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API