Dittman v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Motions to set aside verdicts for plaintiffs and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.
After the jury rendered' their verdict and' were discharged, counsel for defendant conversed with two *53of them, and was informed that one of their body had since the trial began visited the scene of the accident and had reported to the jurors the result of his observations and the condition of the locus in quo at the time of the trial, long after the accident occurred; that during this conversation the name of the juror who made this visitation was not disclosed. The defendant moves to set aside the verdict in both actions upn the ground that the conduct of such juror was prejudicial to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haight v. City of ElmiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- People v. GarrahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jefson v. Crosstown Street RailwayNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Broadway Building Co. v. SaladinoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1913
- Dennis v. TishmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Curry v. QuaitNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- Dittman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909