Legal Opinion · Dissent

Potter v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1925No. 24,738Published

1Dissent

Stone and Quinn, J. J.

(dissenting.)

We concur in the opinion of the learned trial judge that the verdict rests solely on conjecture and therefore should not be permitted to stand. Circumstances forbid extended discussion. The case in this jurisdiction most clearly in point is that of Trustees v. C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co. 119 Minn. 181, 137 N. W. 970. There, a country church had been burned by a fire which, the evidence indicated, started in the dry grass some distance away. There was testimony tending to eliminate every cause other than sparks thrown from defendant’s locomotive. That element, it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trustees of Little Cedar Congregation v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API