Legal Opinion
United Bank of Bismarck v. Young
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1987No. Civ. 11263PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Larry J. Young, appearing pro se, appeals from a district court order denying his motion to “Vacate Sale and Issue Sheriff's Deed.” We affirm the district court’s order and conclude that, pursuant to Rule 38, N.D.R.App.P., an award of double costs and attorney fees to United Bank of Bismarck (United Bank) and Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) for defending this appeal is appropriate.
United Bank foreclosed its mortgage on Young’s farmland during August 1983. A neighbor purchased the property at the subsequent sheriff’s sale in September 1983. FmHA, as holder of a second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Larry J. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Charles W. And Marlene D. Stelly v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. PreusseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Aggie Investments GP v. Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of Emelia Hirsch TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Podrygula v. BrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.